This message was received today by email, the sender having attempted to post as a comment but being unable for some reason. It was a response to our Planning Committee post of 22nd Feb (see below) and is reproduced here with permission:
Unfortunately, planning committee members make decisions every week based on political considerations and specifically on the protection and fast track of their careers, and often against the recommendations of the very planning officers their councils have employed to uphold the local Unitary Development Plans. Now the Government is introducing a "fast track" process for major schemes and infrastructure work, it seems almost pointless to try and protect ones own local environment. Some may applaud this as the end of "Nimbyism," others may see it as yet more erosion of our own rights.
In your case, this web site is indeed a revelation. As an architect I watched this episode thinking "Who are these Nimbys ruining this family's dreams?" Now I have seen your photos, I find the siting of the new "mill" abhorrent and fully understand your actions. CH 4's presentation left much to be desired here, and I now watch GD with far greater cynicism. I'm sorry that a fellow member of my profession did not realise the problems of the design and act accordingly.
About Me
- NeighboursInTheWoods
- South Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
- We are the neighbours of the "Chilterns Water Mill" - featured on the episode of Grand Designs first broadcast on the 4th February 2009. We were asked to take part in the programme, but were strongly advised not to due to the extremely serious nature of allegations we have made against South Oxfordshire District Council - including improper conduct on the part of specific employees and councillors. The council is currently under investigation by the Local Government Ombudsman and the Standards Board for England. If anyone is serious about wanting to know details of the allegations or a fuller account of what has gone on - email me (from an address I can identify please) and we might talk further.
Wednesday, 25 February 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIt seems some words of my post were lost in the copy&paste process, making parts of that post seem non-sensical. The "web-site" in quotation marks should read "nimbyism" and the sentence "CH 4's realize left much..." should be "CH4's presentation left much..."
ReplyDeleteSeeing as your opinions of architects may be quite low now, I don't want to plunge them any further by making us seem illiterate.
Thanks for that - I've corrected your post accordingly. I am doing my best not to tar all architects with the same brush; our distain is mostly reserved for the particular architect responsible for this monstrosity - helpfully credited on the CH4 site for anyone who would like to use his services. We did notice that he perhaps understandably kept rather a low profile on the programme (unlike his creation)...
ReplyDeleteHe had an architect for that thing? I'm surprised anyone would want to put their name to that utter blot on the landscape...
Delete